What Do Most folding camping chair Buyers Get Wrong? The 2026 Expert Buying Guide
Quick Answer: The biggest mistake buyers make is shopping by extras and weight capacity instead of seat tension, stability, and setup friction—the three things that decide whether a chair feels good after 45 minutes, not just the first 5. For most people, the Coleman Portable Camping Quad Chair with 4-Can Cooler is the best buy because it balances comfort, convenience, portability, and price better than the others at $44.99.
Most folding camping chair guides obsess over cup holders, max load numbers, and whether the fabric is “heavy-duty.” That’s incomplete. The real separator is how the chair manages load distribution over time—seat sag, frame flex, and how stable it feels when you shift your weight to stand up.
The standard approach optimizes for feature count. But the data points to fatigue reduction and exit ease. That’s the part buyers notice six weekends later, when a chair that looked fine online starts pinching the thighs, leaning to one side, or fighting you every time you fold it back into the bag.
There’s a reason this matters. In outdoor seating, comfort failure usually comes from geometry, not raw padding. A no-sag or tensioned seat keeps your hips more level, which reduces the “bucket seat” effect that makes your knees rise and your lower back work harder. Even a 1-2 inch difference in seat droop changes how long you can sit comfortably at a campsite, sideline, or tailgate.
That’s also why the three products below stand out. The Coleman wins on all-around value and convenience, the GCI Outdoor Freestyle Rocker wins on premium comfort and motion, and the Kijaro Dual Lock wins for people who hate saggy chairs. Different strengths. Different tradeoffs. And yes… one of the most popular “premium” assumptions in this category turns out to be wrong: more cushioning doesn’t automatically mean more comfort.
What Actually Matters When Choosing a folding camping chair?
The features that matter most are seat support, frame stability, fold/setup speed, and useful storage—not flashy add-ons. The difference between a sag-prone seat and a tensioned seat translates to whether you feel supported for an hour or start shifting every few minutes.
Frame stability matters because outdoor ground is rarely level. A steel frame with better lateral rigidity feels safer when you lean, reach for a drink, or push off to stand. That’s a real-world difference, especially for taller users or anyone using the chair on gravel, grass, or packed dirt.
Setup friction matters more than buyers expect. A chair that’s annoying to unfold or hard to repack gets used less often, even if it’s technically comfortable. That’s why quick-fold systems and secure closed-lock designs matter—they reduce the small daily frustrations that pile up over a season.
Storage only matters when it’s integrated well. A cooler pocket, side organizer, or dual cup holders are useful if they don’t interfere with arm comfort or make the chair bulkier than necessary. The adjacent misconception is that “more pockets” means better design; often it just means more clutter sewn onto a mediocre chair.
Which Specification Has the Biggest Impact on Daily Use?
The single most important spec is seat support design, because it’s what determines sag, posture, and how easy it is to get in and out of the chair. Below a firm-support threshold, you’ll notice hip sink, knee lift, and that stuck-in-a-hammock feeling. Above a certain point, though, ultra-rigid seating can feel too hard for long lounging.
The sweet spot is a chair with moderate cushioning and controlled tension—enough give to stay comfortable, but not so much that your pelvis drops several inches below your knees. That’s why the Kijaro’s no-sag design and the Coleman’s balanced cushioning stand out. The mechanism is simple: better seat tension spreads load more evenly across the frame and fabric, reducing pressure points and lower-back compensation.
What Features Are Worth Paying Extra For?
Rocking motion, no-sag support, and integrated convenience storage are the premium features most worth paying for. A smooth rocker like the GCI typically adds around $25-$30 over a basic chair, but for long evenings by the fire or all-day sideline use, it noticeably reduces fidgeting and pressure buildup.
A no-sag seat design often adds about $5-$15 versus entry-level chairs, and it saves you from the most common long-term complaint in this category: seat droop. Integrated storage like a cooler pocket or organizer doesn’t transform comfort, but it can save dozens of stand-up-and-reach cycles over a weekend.
What isn’t worth much for most buyers? Overbuilt “extreme” weight ratings you won’t use, and decorative premium fabrics that add cost without improving support. Those features sound impressive in listings, but they don’t fix bad geometry or awkward folding.
How Much Should You Actually Spend on a folding camping chair?
For most buyers, the sweet spot is $45 to $60. That’s where you get meaningful comfort upgrades, steel-frame durability, and useful convenience features without paying a premium for niche mechanics.
Under $45, you can still get a solid chair, but you’ll usually sacrifice either seat support, long-session comfort, or ease of folding. In this set, the Coleman at $44.99 is right on the edge of the value zone, which is part of why it’s such a strong recommendation.
Between $45 and $60, “good value” means a chair that solves at least one major pain point—sag, storage, or stability—without introducing another. The Kijaro at $49.99 fits that profile well. Over $70, you’re paying for specialized comfort, like the GCI’s rocking mechanism, and that only makes sense if you’ll actually use the chair for longer sessions or more frequent outings.
The average price of these three popular options is about $56.66. In practical terms, that means a good value chair should either outperform that average on comfort at a lower price, or justify a higher price with a clear mechanism-based benefit you can feel every time you sit down.
Which folding camping chair Products Do We Recommend for Each Budget?
| Product | Price | Rating | Key Specs | Pros | Cons | Best Use Case | Value Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coleman Portable Camping Quad Chair with 4-Can Cooler | $44.99 | 4.7/5 (58,900 reviews) | Built-in 4-can cooler, cushioned seat/back, mesh cup holder, side pocket, foldable steel frame, carry bag | Excellent all-around comfort, useful cooler, strong value, proven popularity, easy transport | Bulkier than minimalist chairs, cooler adds armrest width, less firm than no-sag designs | Camping, tailgating, backyard lounging, general-purpose outdoor use | 9.4/10 |
| GCI Outdoor Freestyle Rocker Portable Folding Rocking Chair | $75.00 | 4.8/5 (23,800 reviews) | Spring-Action Rocking Technology, Eazy-Fold design, durable steel frame, padded armrests, beverage holder | Best premium comfort, smooth rocking motion, quick setup, sturdy feel, high user satisfaction | Highest price, heavier/bulkier, rocking feature less useful on very uneven ground | Campfires, patios, sidelines, users sitting for long stretches | 8.9/10 |
| Kijaro Dual Lock Portable Camping and Sports Chair | $49.99 | 4.6/5 (21,400 reviews) | Dual Lock system, no-sag seat, two cup holders, organizer pocket, carry strap, carry bag | Firm support, stable open/closed locking, practical organization, strong mid-range value | Less plush feel, firmer seat isn’t for everyone, fewer “comfort” extras than Coleman | Sports games, users who hate sagging chairs, frequent transport | 9.1/10 |
What’s the Best folding camping chair for Each Type of Buyer?
Is the Coleman Portable Camping Quad Chair with 4-Can Cooler Worth It for Most Campers and Tailgaters?
Yes, it’s the best folding camping chair here for most people because it gets the basics right while adding genuinely useful convenience features. If you want one chair that works for camping, tailgates, backyard nights, and kids’ sports, this is the easiest recommendation.
The design is straightforward, and that’s part of its strength. Coleman’s steel frame and classic quad-chair architecture don’t try to reinvent anything, but the fully cushioned seat and back make the chair feel more forgiving than many similarly priced models. That matters when you’re sitting for an hour or two instead of just taking a quick break.
The built-in 4-can cooler is more than a gimmick if you actually use your chair in social settings. It keeps a few drinks within reach and reduces the little up-and-down interruptions that make lounging less relaxing. The side pocket and mesh cup holder round out the storage setup without making the chair feel overcomplicated.
In performance terms, the Coleman wins by being broadly comfortable and low-friction to live with. The cushioning helps on hard-packed campsites and sidelines where you’re planted for a while, and the armrest cooler adds convenience without requiring a separate side table. It’s especially good for casual campers who value comfort over rigid support.
Where it differs from the Kijaro is seat feel. The Coleman has more plushness and a more relaxed sit, while the Kijaro feels firmer and more upright. That means the Coleman is usually better for lounging, but if you strongly dislike any hint of sag or you need a chair that feels more structured when standing up, the Kijaro may fit better.
Compared with the GCI Rocker, the Coleman gives up premium motion comfort but saves about $30. That’s a meaningful gap. If you won’t use the rocking feature often, the Coleman delivers a better price-to-comfort ratio.
Pros: The best part of this chair is its balance. You get comfort, storage, portability, and a trusted brand at $44.99, which is below the average price in this comparison. Its 4.7-star rating across 58,900 reviews also signals unusually broad satisfaction rather than niche appeal.
Cons: The downside is that it’s not the firmest or most compact-feeling option. The cooler arm can feel slightly bulkier, and the cushioned seat won’t satisfy buyers who want a taut, no-sag platform. It’s also more of a comfort-first chair than a precision-engineered one.
Who should buy this: Buy the Coleman if you want the safest all-around choice and don’t want to overthink the purchase. It’s ideal for families, weekend campers, tailgaters, and anyone who wants a chair that feels friendly the first time they use it… and still practical months later.
Is the GCI Outdoor Freestyle Rocker Worth It for Long Campfire Nights and Sideline Sitting?
Yes, if you spend long stretches seated outdoors, the GCI Outdoor Freestyle Rocker is worth the premium. It’s the comfort-first pick here, and the rocking mechanism changes the experience in a way basic folding chairs simply don’t.
The standout design element is GCI’s Spring-Action Rocking Technology. Unlike a static chair that concentrates pressure in a few fixed contact points, a rocker allows subtle movement that redistributes load across your back and seat over time. That’s why people often report feeling less stiff after longer sessions in a rocking chair than in a standard camp chair.
The frame is steel and feels intentionally overbuilt for stability during motion. Padded armrests also matter more here than on a standard chair because your arms naturally engage while rocking. The Eazy-Fold design is another practical win—it reduces setup friction, which is important because heavier premium chairs often become annoying if folding them feels like a chore.
In real-world use, the GCI is strongest on patios, campsites, fire rings, and sports sidelines where you’re parked for a while. The motion helps with restlessness, and the chair feels more like a portable lounge seat than a typical event chair. If you’ve ever spent two hours in a cheap folding chair and started shifting every five minutes, this is the kind of upgrade you actually feel.
There are limits, though. Rocking performance depends on reasonably stable ground. On very uneven surfaces, the mechanism can’t work as smoothly, and the benefit shrinks. That’s the adjacent misconception with rocking chairs: buyers assume the feature is universally better, but it really shines on flatter campsites, patios, and maintained fields.
Pros: The biggest advantage is sustained comfort. At 4.8 stars across 23,800 reviews, it has the highest rating in this group, and that aligns with what the design promises—better long-session usability, quick setup, and a sturdy premium feel. The beverage holder and padded armrests add practical comfort rather than decorative fluff.
Cons: The tradeoff is price and portability. At $75, it’s the most expensive option here, and you’re paying for a specialized mechanism rather than just “better materials.” If you mostly need a chair for quick events or occasional use, that premium can be hard to justify.
Who should buy this: Buy the GCI if comfort is your top priority and you regularly sit outdoors for an hour or more at a time. It’s especially good for campfire regulars, sideline parents, patio users, and anyone willing to pay extra to reduce fidgeting and stiffness.
Is the Kijaro Dual Lock Portable Camping and Sports Chair Worth It for Buyers Who Hate Saggy Seats?
Yes, the Kijaro is one of the best choices if your main complaint with folding camping chairs is seat sag. Its Dual Lock system and no-sag seat design make it feel firmer, more stable, and more controlled than many soft-sided alternatives.
The design philosophy here is support-first. The no-sag seat creates a flatter, more taut sitting surface, which helps keep your hips from sinking too low. That improves posture and makes the chair easier to stand up from—an underrated benefit for sports spectators, older users, and anyone who uses a chair repeatedly throughout the day.
The Dual Lock system matters in two ways. When open, it helps the chair feel more planted and less wobbly. When closed, it keeps the chair compact and easier to handle in transport, which sounds minor until you’ve wrestled with a floppy folding chair in a parking lot wind gust.
Performance-wise, the Kijaro is excellent for sports games, school events, and practical everyday outdoor use. The two cup holders and organizer pocket are useful without adding much complexity, and the included carry strap plus carry bag give you options depending on how far you’re walking. It’s a chair that feels built around repeated real use rather than occasional leisure.
The tradeoff is comfort style. Firm support is great for posture and anti-sag performance, but it can feel less cozy than the Coleman and less indulgent than the GCI rocker. That’s not a flaw so much as a fit issue. Buyers who equate softness with comfort may initially prefer the Coleman, while buyers who’ve been burned by droopy seats often end up preferring the Kijaro.
Pros: The Kijaro’s biggest strength is functional support. At $49.99, it sits in the value sweet spot, and its 4.6-star rating across 21,400 reviews suggests that a lot of people specifically appreciate the firmer seating and locking stability. The organization layout is also one of the most practical in the group.
Cons: The main downside is that it won’t feel plush. If your ideal chair is something you sink into by the fire, this may read as too upright or structured. It also doesn’t offer the standout leisure feature of the GCI’s rocking motion or the built-in cooler convenience of the Coleman.
Who should buy this: Buy the Kijaro if you want support, stability, and a more controlled sit. It’s a smart pick for sports parents, frequent event-goers, and anyone who’s tired of chairs that feel good for ten minutes and then collapse into a hammock shape.
How Do These folding camping chair Options Compare in Real-World Performance?
The Coleman performs best as the all-around chair, the GCI performs best for long-session comfort, and the Kijaro performs best for firm support and anti-sag stability. That’s the clearest head-to-head answer if you’re trying to choose quickly.
For setup and pack-down, the GCI’s Eazy-Fold system has the smoothest premium feel, while the Kijaro’s closed-lock behavior makes transport tidier. The Coleman is simple enough, but like many classic quad chairs, it can feel a little more floppy during the repacking phase. That doesn’t make it bad—just less refined.
For comfort over 30 to 90 minutes, the winner depends on what “comfort” means to you. The Coleman is softer and more relaxed, the Kijaro is firmer and more upright, and the GCI adds motion that reduces static pressure. If you tend to fidget or get stiff, the GCI’s rocking mechanism is the most distinct advantage in the group.
For uneven ground, static chairs usually beat rocking chairs. The Coleman and Kijaro are less dependent on surface consistency, while the GCI loses some of its signature benefit if the terrain is too irregular. That’s a failure mode buyers often miss when they assume premium automatically means universally better.
For convenience, the Coleman has the strongest casual-use feature set. A built-in 4-can cooler, cup holder, and side pocket create a mini command center for tailgates and campsites. The Kijaro counters with better organization discipline, while the GCI stays simpler and puts its value into seating experience rather than storage.
If you measure by price-adjusted utility, the Coleman and Kijaro are the strongest values. If you measure by pure enjoyment during long sits, the GCI has the edge. So the “best” chair isn’t one ranking—it depends on whether your pain point is boredom, sag, or paying too much for features you won’t use.
What Is Daily Use Actually Like With These folding camping chair Picks?
Daily use is easiest with the Coleman, most satisfying for long sessions with the GCI, and most structured with the Kijaro. Those differences sound subtle online, but they’re obvious once you live with the chairs for a season.
The Coleman is the least mentally demanding. You unfold it, drop in, stash a drink, and you’re done. That ease matters because products that require no adaptation tend to get used more often, especially in family settings where convenience beats optimization.
The GCI has the highest delight factor. The first time you use the rocking motion around a fire or on a sideline, it feels meaningfully different from a standard chair. But it also asks more of your environment—flatter ground, more space, and a willingness to carry a bulkier premium seat.
The Kijaro has the shortest “adjustment period” for people who value support and the longest for people who prefer plushness. Some users immediately love the taut seat because it feels secure and easy to stand from. Others need a session or two to realize that firm doesn’t mean uncomfortable; it just means your body isn’t sinking into the frame.
On transport, all three are portable, but not equally elegant. The Kijaro’s lock system helps it stay compact in motion, the Coleman is familiar and manageable, and the GCI is the one you’re most likely to notice carrying over longer distances. That’s not a dealbreaker… it just means the premium comfort comes with a portability tax.
Support ecosystem also matters. Coleman and GCI are both highly recognizable outdoor brands with broad buyer familiarity, while Kijaro has built a strong reputation specifically around practical event and camp seating. In a category flooded with generic lookalikes, brand track record and tens of thousands of reviews are useful quality filters, not just vanity metrics.
How Does Price Change the Value Equation for a folding camping chair?
Price changes the value equation only when it maps to a benefit you’ll actually feel. Paying $30 more for a rocking mechanism makes sense if you sit for hours; paying $5-$10 more for better seat support makes sense for almost everyone.
The Coleman has the best broad-market value because $44.99 buys comfort, storage, and a proven design with nearly 59,000 reviews. That’s hard to beat. You’re getting a chair that solves multiple common use cases without pushing into premium pricing.
The Kijaro is a close value contender at $49.99 because its no-sag and lock-focused design addresses a specific high-friction problem. If you’ve replaced droopy chairs before, the extra $5 over the Coleman can be money well spent. That’s a classic case where “value” depends on pain-point match, not lowest price.
The GCI is the least budget-friendly but not overpriced. At $75, it’s charging for a real mechanism, not cosmetic upgrades. The hidden cost is bulk and the possibility that you won’t use the rocking advantage enough to justify the premium.
If you’re deal hunting, the best strategy is simple: buy the Coleman when you want low-risk value, buy the Kijaro when support matters more than softness, and only buy the GCI when you already know you enjoy rocking motion. That’s how you avoid paying premium money for a feature that sounds better in a listing than it feels in your actual routine.
What Are the 3 Most Common folding camping chair Buying Mistakes?
There are three buying mistakes that show up again and again in this category, and all three come from focusing on what looks impressive instead of what feels good after repeated use.
-
Buying by weight capacity alone. Buyers fall for this because load ratings feel objective and reassuring. But a high capacity number doesn’t tell you whether the seat sags, the frame twists, or the chair is comfortable for your body shape. Do this instead: treat capacity as a minimum safety check, then prioritize seat support and stability design.
-
Assuming more padding equals more comfort. This happens because softness is easy to understand in product photos and listings. The trap is that extra padding can hide poor support geometry, especially if the seat drops too low over time. Do this instead: look for controlled support—like no-sag construction or balanced cushioning—rather than maximum plushness.
-
Paying for premium features you won’t use weekly. Buyers often overestimate how much they’ll value rocking, oversized storage, or specialty extras once the novelty wears off. The result is a heavier, pricier chair that doesn’t fit their actual routine. Do this instead: buy for your most common use case, not your most aspirational one.
How Can You Tell Quality From Marketing Hype in folding camping chair?
You can tell quality from hype by looking for mechanisms and usage signals, not adjectives. Claims like “heavy-duty,” “ultimate comfort,” or “premium outdoor design” are too vague to verify on their own and often hide the fact that the chair’s geometry is ordinary.
One misleading claim is oversized emphasis on “supports up to X pounds” without explaining seat construction. That tells you about static load tolerance, not comfort, long-term sag resistance, or lateral stability. Another weak signal is feature stacking—multiple pockets, cup holders, and accessories attached to a chair that still has poor support fundamentals.
Green flags are more concrete. Named mechanisms like GCI’s Spring-Action Rocking Technology or Kijaro’s Dual Lock system are useful because they describe how the chair behaves, not just how it’s marketed. High review counts also matter when they’re paired with strong ratings—4.6 to 4.8 across 21,400 to 58,900 reviews suggests patterns of durable satisfaction, not a handful of early impressions.
Material transparency is another good sign. Steel frame construction, carry system details, and seat design language like “no-sag” are more meaningful than generic comfort claims. The key distinction is this: real quality tells you why the chair should perform better and where it might still fall short.
Your folding camping chair Questions — Answered
What is the best folding camping chair for most people?
The best folding camping chair for most people is the Coleman Portable Camping Quad Chair with 4-Can Cooler. It hits the broadest sweet spot on comfort, convenience, portability, and price.
At $44.99, it’s also below the average price of the three chairs in this guide, which improves its value case. The built-in cooler, cushioned seat and back, side pocket, and cup holder all solve real outdoor-use annoyances without making the chair feel overly specialized.
It matters because most buyers don’t need a niche chair—they need a dependable one. The common mistake is overbuying for rare situations, like paying premium money for rocking motion when most use happens at short sports events or casual backyard gatherings.
Are rocking folding camping chairs better than standard ones?
Rocking folding camping chairs are better only if you sit for long stretches and usually use them on reasonably flat ground. If those conditions don’t apply, a standard chair often gives you better value and simpler portability.
The benefit of a rocking chair like the GCI Outdoor Freestyle Rocker comes from movement. That motion redistributes pressure and reduces the static stiffness that builds up during long sitting sessions. It’s a real mechanism-based advantage, not just a novelty.
The mistake is assuming rocking is always superior. On uneven terrain, the motion becomes less smooth, and the extra cost and bulk may not pay off. That’s why rocking chairs are best for campfires, patios, and maintained fields—not every campsite or parking-lot event.
How long should a good folding camping chair last?
A good folding camping chair should last several seasons of regular use if the frame stays rigid and the seat fabric doesn’t develop major sag. Longevity depends less on brand slogans and more on seat tension, hinge stress, and how the chair is stored between trips.
Steel frames generally hold up well in this category, but the first failure point is often fabric fatigue or joint wear from repeated folding. Chairs with no-sag support systems or better-controlled folding mechanics tend to age more gracefully because they reduce repeated stress concentration in the same spots.
Storage matters more than most buyers think. Leaving a chair damp, dirty, or compressed carelessly in a trunk for months shortens its life. The misconception is that durability is fixed at purchase; in reality, maintenance habits can noticeably change lifespan.
Is a no-sag seat better for your back?
Yes, a no-sag seat is often better for your back if you dislike sinking too low or sitting in a hammock-like posture. It helps keep your hips more level and makes it easier to maintain a neutral seated position.
The mechanism is simple: when your pelvis drops too far below your knees, your lower back often compensates, and you start shifting more. A firmer seat like the Kijaro’s no-sag design reduces that drop and can feel more supportive during repeated use, especially at sports events or long waits.
The adjacent misconception is that firmer always means less comfortable. For some people, especially those who hate soft seating, firm support is exactly what creates comfort. The exception is buyers who want a lounge-like feel and don’t mind a more relaxed posture.
What should I look for if I need a folding camping chair for sports games?
For sports games, look for easy transport, stable support, and storage you can access without standing up. A chair that feels easy to carry from the car and comfortable for repeated sit-stand cycles will matter more than luxury features.
The Kijaro is especially strong here because the Dual Lock system helps with transport and the no-sag seat makes standing up easier. The Coleman is also a good sports-game choice if you want softer comfort and more casual convenience, especially for longer family outings.
The common mistake is buying a chair optimized for campsite lounging when your real use case is sideline practicality. Sports seating usually rewards support, compact handling, and organizer access more than plushness or novelty features.
How much weight capacity do I really need in a folding camping chair?
You need enough weight capacity for safe use, but once you’re comfortably above your body weight, seat design matters more than chasing the highest number. Capacity is a threshold spec, not a comfort spec.
Buyers often use weight ratings as a shortcut because they’re easy to compare. The problem is that two chairs with similar ratings can feel completely different in support, stability, and ease of standing. That’s why seat tension and frame behavior under movement matter more in daily life.
Use capacity as a filter, then move on. The mistake is treating it like a ranking system. A chair with a huge rating but poor seat geometry can still feel worse than a lower-rated chair with better support engineering.
What features are actually useful on a folding camping chair?
The most useful features are the ones that reduce repeated friction: a supportive seat, stable frame, easy fold system, and practical storage like a cup holder, organizer, or cooler pocket. Those improve the experience every single time you use the chair.
The Coleman shows this well with its integrated cooler and side pocket, while the Kijaro adds dual cup holders and an organizer pocket. The GCI takes a different route by making the premium feature the seating experience itself through rocking motion.
What usually isn’t useful? Decorative extras that add bulk without changing comfort or convenience. Buyers often confuse “more features” with “better product,” but the best chairs are the ones where each feature solves a real annoyance rather than just filling space on a product page.
What’s the Single Smartest folding camping chair Decision You Can Make Right Now?
The smartest decision is to choose your chair by how you want the seat to feel after 45 minutes, not by how impressive the feature list looks in a thumbnail. That’s the dividing line between a chair you’ll keep grabbing from the garage and one that slowly gets demoted to “backup seating.”
If you want the safest all-around bet, get the Coleman. If you know you crave motion and linger by the fire, get the GCI. If you hate sag and want a chair that feels taut and ready every time, get the Kijaro.
But if you’re standing in your driveway before a weekend trip, sliding one chair into the trunk and knowing it’ll handle the campsite, the soccer field, and the late-night backyard conversation without drama… that’s the Coleman, folded up in its bag, cooler pocket waiting, ready before the sun’s even fully down.
Affiliate Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases. This means if you click a link and make a purchase, we may receive a small commission at no extra cost to you.